Why Ed Reinle Isn't the Candidate Hardyston Needs
Two board goals were written with Ed Reinle's shortcomings in mind. Years later, the problems remain - and voters should take note.
Every election, we choose who gets to shape our schools. And every election, the same question matters: has this person earned another term?
In Ed Reinle’s case, that answer gets harder to defend.
This year, two official board goals weren’t generic “good governance” fluff. They addressed issues tied directly to Ed’s record.
Goal Complete mandatory training as early as possible.
In past years, Ed dragged his feet until the very end - and only after multiple prods (and sometimes borderline pleading) from the business administrator. Training isn’t busywork; it’s the foundation for informed decision-making. If you can’t be bothered to get it done without someone holding your hand, that’s a problem.
Goal Come to meetings and committees prepared.
Seems basic, right? Unfortunately, Ed has a history of walking into meetings without having read the materials - which means he often doesn’t know what he’s voting on.
There was almost a reset moment. During last night’s policy discussion, Ed considered tabling the vote until the next month so he could come prepared. For a second, it looked like he’d take the responsible route. Then he backed off - and voted anyway, unprepared. That isn’t just one moment; it fits a broader pattern.
When your board goals are basically reminders to do the bare minimum, and even then you can’t follow through, it’s a sign that maybe it’s time to step aside. And if he shows up at all, Hardyston deserves someone who’s ready to put in the work from day one.