Post

Double Standards and Hidden Agendas: Hardyston's Transparency Problem

Double Standards and Hidden Agendas: Hardyston's Transparency Problem

In public service, transparency isn’t a favor-it’s an obligation. The community deserves to know how decisions are made and why. It’s basic. It’s non-negotiable.

But under Board President Donna Carey, transparency seems to come with fine print: only when it benefits her.

Let’s take a closer look at what real transparency should look like-and how Donna Carey keeps falling short.


🔍 A Model for How Transparency Should Work

Recently, we saw a great example of how board communication should be handled.

A board member made a legal request. At first, the Board Secretary thought it was a private matter. But when the board member persisted, the request was kicked up to the school attorney.

Here’s what happened next:

Donna Carey Legal Request

The right steps were taken:

  1. All board members were notified about the request and the attorney’s response.
  2. The full legal opinion was shared openly with the entire board.
  3. Everyone got a formal explanation, so nobody was left in the dark.

That’s transparency: equal access to information, no special treatment, no secrets.


🟥 Donna Carey’s Version of Transparency: Selective and Self-Serving

Now, contrast that with Carey’s track record.

  • Secret legal consultations that the full board wasn’t informed about
  • Decisions made behind closed doors, with “updates” only after the fact
  • Rejected proposals for greater transparency, especially when they would’ve made her more accountable

Carey’s pattern couldn’t be clearer:

  • Modify policies to consolidate power
  • Share info when it benefits her-hide it when it doesn’t
  • Accuse others of creating “drama”-while fueling division through secrecy

Call it what it is: an abuse of power, not leadership.


🔹 The Basics of Real Transparency

If you’re serious about good governance, you follow a few simple rules:

  • All legal requests should be logged and shared immediately.
  • All legal opinions belong to the full board, not a select few.
  • No individual board member-president or not-should use attorneys for personal or political gain.
  • When someone refuses transparency, that’s a red flag-not business as usual.

🔶 Conclusion: Carey’s Double Standard Hurts Everyone

Transparency isn’t optional-it’s the backbone of trust.

But under Donna Carey’s leadership, it’s been weaponized-something used when it’s convenient and tossed aside when it’s not.

The sad part? The Hardyston community deserves better. Open conversations. Honest leadership. Decisions made with the community-not hidden from it.

We’ve already seen how transparency should work.

The real question is: Will Donna Carey ever follow it-or keep hiding behind closed doors?